Are you ready to talk?

Solving Unexpected Results in Abaqus

Table of contents

Sometimes the results I get from Abaqus are not what I expect. Perhaps the analysis does not complete while I didn't think it would be very troublesome, or I do get results, but they don't make sense to me. Though this can be very frustrating, it can also be seen as an interesting puzzle (especially if it is somebody else's problem ;) ). For that reason, I'd like to share some results with you that did not make sense to me. Let's see whether you can figure out what went wrong!

The Problem

I wanted to simulate a long, thin structure with relatively large displacements. I chose fiber winding for this, similar to this blog. I drew a fiber and a reel. The reel was modeled as a discrete rigid. I applied some pretension and let the reel rotate. This is what happened:

Not what I expected. So what do you think is going on?

I can give some hints:

- It's still there if I switch perspective off.

- Only including the rigid body from different sides contouring the displacement, gives this:

 

It doesn't look very rigid, does it?

Still, I'm 100% sure that it is modelled as a rigid body.

[And no, it is not a bug in the software. 😜]

So What Can It Be?

Some more hints:

- It was a stupid mistake.

- Abaqus was already open when I started doing this. If I would have used a fresh version, I wouldn't have had the issue.

- By changing one setting back to the default, I can get the expected result with the same odb:

 

What was the setting?

Conclusion

I hope you enjoyed thinking about this. I think it nicely shows that while I may be tempted to look for 'big' causes, sometimes the actual problem is so small that I overlook it.

In order to find the cause of problems - big or small - it helps to understand what the software does, what can typically go wrong and where to look for symptoms. Our online convergence training called "Obtaining a  converged solution with Abaqus" will help you do just that, so hopefully you will see (convergence) issues more as a puzzle than as a problem.

Case Studies

In fiercely competitive industries, efficiency, transparency, and responsibility are more in demand than ever. That’s why we help clients deploy solutions that simplify processes, drive product innovation, and shorten time to market.
Advanced Simulation Icon Advanced Simulation Icon Advanced Simulation

Best Practices for Dynamic Analysis of Bridges

BRIGADE/Plus provides comprehensive tools for static and dynamic analysis of bridges under various load conditions, ensuring structural resilience.
Advanced Simulation Icon Advanced Simulation Icon Advanced Simulation

New Year, New Fortran Compiler

Learn how to resolve compatibility issues between Abaqus and the Intel Fortran compiler after the discontinuation of ifort in 2025. This guide covers installation and setup for both Windows and Linux, helping you smoothly switch to the ifx compiler for user subroutine integration. Follow detailed instructions to modify environment files and install necessary toolkits, ensuring uninterrupted analysis performance.
Advanced Simulation Icon Advanced Simulation Icon Advanced Simulation

Extended free body cut

Discover the trade-offs bridge engineers face in balancing simplicity and accuracy in structural analysis. Learn how BRIGADE/Plus revolutionizes bridge design with the Extended Free-Body Cut (FBC) method, enabling precise calculations for complex geometries, moving loads, and detailed 3D effects. Explore how this advanced feature bridges the gap between traditional models and modern engineering demands. Stay ahead in bridge engineering with TECHNIA’s cutting-edge solutions

Want to receive more content like this?

Sign up to receive a weekly roundup of Expert insights as they are published...

  • Related news & articles straight to your inbox
  • Hints, tips & how-tos
  • Thought leadership articles