Are you ready to talk?

Simulating Railway Track Hot Rolling in Abaqus

Table of contents

In the hot rolling process, metal is heated and passed through one or more sets of rollers, to give it the desired cross-section for example. This process is used for the fabrication on railway tracks (Figure 1).

 

TrainTrack

Figure 1: Example of a railway track (By Photnart - Own work, CC0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=26572319)

Twenty rolling operations may be used to obtain the final shape. In this blog, we will simulate part of this process, using Abaqus. A while back, we posted a blog on simulating roll forming in Abaqus. This was about sheet metal forming, where the sheet metal was described by shell elements. For the application in this blog,  shell theory is not valid and solid elements will be used.

Geometry

The to-be-formed metal and rollers are included in the analysis, as shown in Figure 2.

2_rail hot rolling_assembly

Figure 2: Included geometry

For reasons of symmetry, only one roller and only half of the metal stock is included. The separate parts including mesh are shown in Figure 3. The roller is simulated as an analytical rigid body, and therefore does not require a mesh.

3_rail hot rolling_parts

Figure 3: Metal stock part (left) and rigid roller (right)

Material Properties

No material properties are needed for the rigid roller. Since the permanent deformation of the metal during this process is very important, the metal is modelled using elastic-plastic properties. In the current set-up temperature-dependence is not included. Young's modulus and yield stress are lower than at room temperature however, to take into account the influence of the elevated temperature. 

Model Set-up

Symmetry conditions are applied. A rotational velocity is prescribed to the roller. An Abaqus/Explicit step is used, with a time period of 0.6 s. A velocity of 10 m/s is prescribed to the metal stock to move it forward. This velocity and step time were chosen so the kinetic energy was small compared to the internal energy in the model, and the analysis is effectively quasi-static. Contact is taken into account with a friction coefficient of 0.3. An overview of this set-up is shown in Figure 4.

4_rail hot rolling_setup

Figure 4: Boundary conditions applied to the model.

Results

During the analysis, the metal is rolled into it's new shape (Figure 5, movies).

7_process

Figure 5: Rail track during forming process.

 

 

At the end of the analysis, the shape is clearly modified compared to the starting shape (Figure 6).

6_deformed_undeformed

Figure 6: Deformed shape (green) compared to initial shape (gray).

Stresses concentrate at the corners, as expected (Figure 7).

 

5_deformed shape_stress

Figure 7: Mises stress (Pa) at the end of the analysis.

Discussion

The current model does not include thermal effects. It is possible to perform a fully coupled thermal-mechanical analysis, including heat exchange between roller and metal as well as convection and radiation with respect to the environment and how this influences material properties and thermal expansion during the process. This makes matters a lot more complex and requires additional material data.

Some elements distort quite a lot during this analysis (Figure 8), as is common for forming analyses of solid (rather than plate) materials. ALE adaptive meshing may help to keep a reasonable mesh during this type of analysis.

rail hot rolling_deformed mesh

Figure 8: Deformed shape, highlighting distorted elements

If the steady-state situation is of interest then ALE adaptive meshing can be used to feed the material through the mesh. In this case, it is not necessary to simulate the whole part: material moves through a section of it using inflow and outflow conditions.

Currently, one step of the forming process is simulated. To simulate the entire process, a number of analyses is required. This may require further remeshing.

Conclusion

Abaqus offers the tools to include the complexity and large deformations needed to simulate the hot forming process.

Need to speak to an expert?

Our simulation team are on-hand to provide tailored guidance and support with a deep knowledge of the full SIMULIA portfolio. Reach out to talk to an expert today.

Case Studies

In fiercely competitive industries, efficiency, transparency, and responsibility are more in demand than ever. That’s why we help clients deploy solutions that simplify processes, drive product innovation, and shorten time to market.
Advanced Simulation Icon Advanced Simulation Icon Advanced Simulation

Best Practices for Dynamic Analysis of Bridges

BRIGADE/Plus provides comprehensive tools for static and dynamic analysis of bridges under various load conditions, ensuring structural resilience.
Advanced Simulation Icon Advanced Simulation Icon Advanced Simulation

New Year, New Fortran Compiler

Learn how to resolve compatibility issues between Abaqus and the Intel Fortran compiler after the discontinuation of ifort in 2025. This guide covers installation and setup for both Windows and Linux, helping you smoothly switch to the ifx compiler for user subroutine integration. Follow detailed instructions to modify environment files and install necessary toolkits, ensuring uninterrupted analysis performance.
Advanced Simulation Icon Advanced Simulation Icon Advanced Simulation

Extended free body cut

Discover the trade-offs bridge engineers face in balancing simplicity and accuracy in structural analysis. Learn how BRIGADE/Plus revolutionizes bridge design with the Extended Free-Body Cut (FBC) method, enabling precise calculations for complex geometries, moving loads, and detailed 3D effects. Explore how this advanced feature bridges the gap between traditional models and modern engineering demands. Stay ahead in bridge engineering with TECHNIA’s cutting-edge solutions

Want to receive more content like this?

Sign up to receive a weekly roundup of Expert insights as they are published...

  • Related news & articles straight to your inbox
  • Hints, tips & how-tos
  • Thought leadership articles